Web Survey Bibliography
Title Development and validation of a single- item scale for the relative assessment of physical attractiveness
Author Lutz, J.; Kemper, C. J.; Beierlein, C.; etc.
Source methods, data, analyses
Year 2013
Access date 17.03.2016
Full text PDF (807 KB)
Abstract
Physical attractiveness is an important factor of social interaction and cognition, such as in mate choice or in the impressions people form of themselves and of others. In the context of social and health sciences, physical attractiveness has also been shown to complement the prediction of various target variables. Among other relationships, physical attractiveness is associated with criteria of professional success, various health variables and overall life satisfaction. However, the measurement of physical attractiveness via absolute ratings has several shortcomings. For example, attractiveness judgments are influenced by characteristics of the rater. As pointed out in literature, especially the interaction between age and gender of rater and target person has a significant impact on rating scores. The aim of this study was to construct a scale for the economical, reliable and valid assessment of physical attractiveness, controlling for methodological problems reported in prior research. To achieve this, the Attractiveness Rating 1 (AR1) employs a relative measurement approach. The AR1 was constructed and validated using four diverse samples.The presented results suggest that the AR1 adequately measures physical attractiveness.
Abstract - optional
Physische Attraktivität ist ein wichtiger Faktor sozialer Interaktion und Kognition, z.B. bei der Partnerwahl oder dem Eindruck, den sich Menschen von sich selbst und von anderen bilden. Auch im Rahmen von Umfragen könnte die physische Attraktivität sozial- und gesundheitswissenschaftliche Erklärungsmodelle sinnvoll ergänzen. So finden sich unter anderem Zusammenhänge mit Kriterien des Berufserfolgs, diversen Gesundheitsvariablen und der allgemeinen Lebenszufriedenheit. Die Messung physischer Attraktivität mittels absoluten Einschätzungen hat sich jedoch als problematisch erwiesen. Attraktivitätsurteile können z.B. von Charakteristika der Beurteiler beeinflusst werden. Vor allem die Interaktion zwischen Alter und Geschlecht von Beurteiler und Zielperson wird in der Literatur als Einflussfaktor berichtet. Zie der vorliegenden Studie war daher die Konstruktion einer Skala zur ökonomischen, reliablen und validen Messung von physischer Attraktivität, die den in der Literatur berichteten Problemen Rechnung trägt. Um dies zu erreichen wird im Attraktivitätsrating 1 (AR1) ein relatives Messkonzept eingesetzt. Das AR1 wurde anhand von vieralters-, geschlechts- und bildungsheterogenen Stichproben konstruiert und validiert. Die berichteten Ergebnisse sprechen dafür, dass das AR1 das Merkmal physische Attraktivität adäquat abbildet.
Access/Direct link GESIS vol. 7(2), 2013, pp. 209-232
Year of publication2013
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web survey bibliography (272)
- Usability Testing for Survey Research; 2017; Geisen, E.; Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
- A Case Study on Evaluating the Relevance of Some Rules for Writing Requirements through an Online Survey...; 2017; Warnier, M.; Condamines, A.
- Web Health Monitoring Survey: A New Approach to Enhance the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Systems ; 2016; Romano, M. F.; Sardella, M. V.; Alboni, F.
- Design and test of a web-survey for collecting observer’s ratings on dairy goats’ behavioural...; 2016; Vieira, A.; Oliveira, M. D.; Nunes, T.; Stilwell, G.
- A look at the unique data-gathering process behind the Harvard Impact Study; 2016; Vitale, J.
- Analyzing Cognitive Burden of Survey Questions with Paradata: A Web Survey Experiment; 2016; Hoehne, J. K.; Schlosser, S.; Krebs, D.
- Gamification of Online Surveys: Design Process, Case Study, and Evaluation; 2015; Harms, J.; Biegler, S.; Wimmer, C.; Kappel, K.; Grechenig, T.
- Finding Item Nonresponse Patterns: Three Internet Survey Experiments Into the Effects of Nonresponse...; 2015; Van De Maat, J.
- The Effects of Adding a Mobile-Compatible Design to the American Life Panel; 2015; Toepoel, V.; Lugtig, P. J.; Amin, A.
- Technology and Reporting of Daily Activities – Considerations for Analysis of Behaviours in Mixed...; 2015; Fisher, K.; Gershuny, J.
- Cheating in web surveys. Evidence from a split-ballot repeated experiment on knowledge questions on...; 2015; Ladini, R.; Vezzoni, C.
- Unplanned use of mobile devices in a probabilistic online panel survey: Patterns of use and implications...; 2015; Poggio, T.; Bosnjak, M.; Bandilla, W.; Weyandt, K.
- The importance of scale direction between different modes; 2015; Agalioti-sgompou, V.
- Examining the Impact of Mobile First and Responsive Web Design on Desktop and Mobile Respondents; 2015; Tharp, D.
- Boosting Probability-Based Web Survey Response Rates via Nonresponse Follow-Up; 2015; Chew, K.; Fontes, A.; Lavrakas, P. J.
- Cognitive Testing of Survey Translations: Does Respondent Language Proficiency Matter?; 2015; Schoua-Glusberg, A.; Park, H.; Meyer, M.; Goerman, P. L.; Sha, M.
- Questionnaire length and breakoffs in web surveys: a meta study; 2014; Vehovar, V., Cehovin, G.
- Inside the Turk Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool; 2014; Paolacci, G., Chandler, J.
- Social Media and Online Survey: Tools for Knowledge Management in Health Research ; 2014; Merolli, M., Sanchez, F. J. M., Gray, K.
- Development and validation of a single- item scale for the relative assessment of physical attractiveness...; 2013; Lutz, J.; Kemper, C. J.; Beierlein, C.; etc.
- A standard with quality indicators for web panel surveys: a Swedish example; 2013; Nyfjaell, M.
- Developing a New Mixed-Mode Methodology For a Provincial Park Camper Survey in British Columbia; 2013; Dyck, B. W.
- Scientific impact of the MESS Project: A brief overview; 2013; Das, M.
- Using the iPad as a Prize-Based Incentive to Boost Response Rates: A Case Study at Brigham Young University...; 2013; McClendon, R., Olsen, D.
- Using Qualitative and Quantitative Testing to Improve Hispanic Response Rates for Online Surveys; 2013; Pens, Y., Gentry, R. J.
- The ONS Beyond 2011 Programme & possible implications for social surveys; 2013; Morris, L.
- Survey Research; 2013; Abbott, M. L., McKinney, J.
- The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback; 2013; Baelter, O., Enstroem, E., Klingenberg, B.
- Web CATI (Part of NatCen’s Multi-Mode Approach) ; 2012; Damestani, P., Agur, M.
- What is Online Research?: Using the Internet for Social Science Research; 2012; Hooley, H., Wellens, J., Marriott, J.
- WebSM Study: Survey software features overview ; 2012; Vehovar, V., Cehovin, G., Kavcic, L., Lenar, J.
- What Survey Modes are Most Effective in Eliciting Self-Reports of Criminal or Delinquent Behavior?; 2012; Kleck, G., Roberts, K.
- Assessing Cross-National Equivalence of Measures of Xenophobia: Evidence from Probing in Web Surveys; 2012; Behr, D., Braun, M., Kaczmirek, L.
- Adaptive web sampling in ecology; 2012; Thompson, S. K.
- Online Data Collection in the Agro-Food Sector; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
- Psychometric properties of an internet administered version of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability...; 2012; Vesteinsdottir, V., Reips, U.-D., Joinson, A. N., Porsdottir, F.
- Research design for studying online communities with web surveys; 2012; Petrovcic, A., Petric, G., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Case study: Respondent perspective on survey response; 2012; Jarrett, C.
- Presidential Elections in Iceland 2012 – Did online panel surveys give false hope to new candidates...; 2012; Jonsdottir, G. A., Dofradottir, A. G., Bjornsdottir, A. E.
- Internet Mobility Survey Sampling Biases in Measuring Frequency of Use of Transport Modes ; 2012; Diana, M.
- Qualitatively Speaking: Mobile qualitative finally hits its stride; 2012; Bryson, J.
- Using Collaborative Web Technology to Construct the Health Information National Trends Survey; 2012; Moser, R. P., Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Blake, K., Hesse, B. W.
- A Shot in the Dark: Measurement Influence on Likelihood to Vaccination; 2012; Higgins, W. B., Thomas, R. K.
- Using Online Panels for National Surveys of Low Incidence Populations: Findings from the CDC Influenza...; 2012; Boyle, J., Ball, S., Ding, H., Srinath, K. P., Euler, G.
- Drop-Off Point for Undergraduate Students on a Web-based Alcohol and Tobacco Use Questionnaire; 2012; Mitra, A.
- An Examination of the 2010 Census Be Counted Program and Its Effects on Census Coverage and Duplication...; 2012; Jackson, G. I., Wechter, K. M.
- The Detection and Effects of Data From Potentially Ineligible Participants in Online Survey Research...; 2012; Grey, J.
- Internet Mobility Survey Sampling Biases in Measuring Frequency of Use of Different Transport Modes; 2012; Diana, M.
- Continuous large-scale volunteer web-surveys: The experience of Lohnspiegel and WageIndicator; 2012; Oez, F.
- FamilyVote – Conducting online surveys with children and families; 2012; Geissler, H., Peeters, H.